[Revisor-users] Better handling of comps.xml was: Some questions on comps.xml and kcikstart file

[Jeroen van Meeuwen]

Alexander Todorov wrote:
> Based on the discussion on anaconda-devel-list I would say that the 
> Group: rpm tag can be used to generate a comps.xml for any 3rd 
> party/personal repository. However I don't think such functionality 
> should be incorporated in Revisor. Better leave it as a separate tool 
> and let people easily create a comps.xml skeleton and only include in 
> Revisor the above idea.

Yes, I agree there.

> This will make a good point separating the code and not overloading 
> Revisor with extra functionality. If one doesn't like the "Additional 
> packages" group, then use a tool and create/customize your own comps.xml 
> file.

Have we also thought about adding a "Uncategorized"/"Ungrouped" for RPMs 
without a Group header?

> 
> Greetings,
> Alexander.
> _______________________________________________
> Revisor-users mailing list
> Revisor-users at fedoraunity.org
> http://lists.fedoraunity.org/mailman/listinfo/revisor-users